Community Unit School District 200 Board of Education met Nov. 12.
Here are the minutes provided by the board:
The first regular meeting of the month of November of the Board of Education of Community Unit School District 200, DuPage County, Illinois, was called to order at the Emerson Elementary School, 119 S. Woodlawn St., Wheaton, IL, by Board President Rob Hanlon, on Wednesday, November 12, 2025, at 7:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
Upon the roll being called, the following were present:
Board Members: Mr. Rob Hanlon
Ms. Julie Kulovits
Mr. Dave Long
Ms. Angela Blatner
Ms. Katy Ebbesen
Mr. Erik Hjerpe
Mr. John Rutledge
Also in Attendance: Dr. Jeff Schuler, Superintendent
Ms. Alyssa Barry
Mr. Matt Biscan
Ms. Melissa Murphy
Dr. Brian O’Keeffe
Dr. Chris Silagi
Mr. Jason Spencer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Board Member John Rutledge led the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance.
COMMUNICATION WITH THE HOST SCHOOL
Ms. Katie DeLaRosa, principal of Emerson Elementary School, welcomed everyone to the school and talked about gratitude, as it is the month of November. Students from all grades shared why Emerson is a special place and why they are grateful for the school and its community – including the various assemblies, clubs and activities, the Emerson families and staff, and a supportive Board of Education.
MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA
None
RECOGNITIONS & ACHIEVEMENTS
Recognition of WWS Girls Tennis Class 2A Doubles State Champions
● Reese and Riley Lepsi
As part of this year’s Community Partner Recognition Program, principals from our hosting schools were asked to recognize a community member or members who have played an important role or made a significant impact in advancing the school’s work, mission, or community. Dr. Schuler and the Board recognized the following:
Community Partnership Recognition:
Principal Katie DeLaRosa recognized Vanessa O’Brien for her dedication to the Emerson community and her constant presence at the school for over twenty years as a parent, lunch supervisor, Camp Kinder staff member, and long-term substitute teacher. Her kindness, warmth, and commitment to the Emerson community were highlighted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS – Agenda Items & Non-Agenda Items
In accordance with Board Policy 2.230, members of the public wishing to offer public comment had the opportunity to do so. A public comment sign-up sheet was made available until 7:00 p.m. at the meeting site. The Board Meeting was available for viewing via live stream on the District’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/communityunitschooldistrict200.
Per Board Policy, the Board may shorten the time allocation for each person to less than three minutes to allow the maximum number of people the opportunity to speak. The Board did not shorten the time allocation for each speaker due to the number of speakers.
Speaker Topic
Amanda Dudgeon School Praise
Tara Ann Robertson School Praise
Tom Aiello Flags in Classroom
Michael LaFido Flags in Classroom
SUPERINTENDENT REPORT
Dr. Schuler provided the following updates:
● School Board Member Appreciation Day is on November 15th. Few volunteer roles demand as much time or go as unrecognized as that of a school board member. They play a crucial role in the leadership and governance of our District. Board members were thanked for their service on behalf of the entire team at the district office and in District 200.
● Expanded community outreach by establishing three new parent advisory committees, including the Career Pathways Advisory Council, the School Safety and Student Wellness Advisory Council, and the Technology Education Council. Previously, there were three standing committees: the Citizens Advisory Committee, the Bilingual Parent Advisory Committee, and the Special Education Advisory Council, which was developed last year. Members of the Senior Leadership Team provided an update on the new committees and shared a snapshot of their work this year.
● The Student Ambassadors at WNHS and WWSHS reported on their high schools’ activities, athletics, and events from the past week, and provided updates and next steps on the projects they will be working on this school year. Wheaton Warrenville South’s main project will be the school bathrooms, while Wheaton North’s primary focus will be on participation in extracurricular activities. Additionally, each team will work on smaller projects.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Acceptance of Gifts from Wheaton Warrenville South Tiger PAWS – Recommend acceptance of gifts from WWS Tiger Paws as presented.
2. Approval to Post Curriculum Content for Principles of Engineering High School Course for Community Review – Recommend approval to post the Principles of Engineering curriculum content for community review as presented.
3. Approval of Maintenance Vehicles Purchase – Recommend approval of the purchase of maintenance vehicles as presented.
4. Approval of Bills Payable and Payroll – Recommend approval of bills payable and payroll as presented.
5. Approval of Minutes – October 8, 2025, Regular Meeting, Open, October 22, 2025, Committee of the Whole, Open, October 24, 2025, Special Meeting with Local Elected Officials, Open, and Approval to Destroy Recordings of Closed Sessions Prior to June 2024 As Allowable by Law – Recommend approval of the minutes as presented and approve the destruction of recordings of closed sessions prior to June 2024 as allowable by law.
6. Approval of Personnel Report to Include Employment, Resignation, Retirement, and Leave of Absence of Administrative, Certified, Classified, and Non-Union Staff – Recommend approval of the personnel report as presented.
There was additional information/comments provided on the following:
● Item #1: Thank you to Tiger PAWS for the generous gifts. We are grateful for all the organizations that raise funds for the District.
● Item #2: Posting of curriculum for the engineering course is the continued expansion of the Engineering Career Pathway.
MOTION
Member Rutledge moved, Member Kulovits seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: AYE 7, NAY 0. The motion carried 7-0.
FACILITIES APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of FY26 School Maintenance Project Grant Submission – Recommend approval of submission of FY26 Round 1 School Maintenance Project Grant as presented. 2. Approval of Bids for 2026 Facility Improvements: Paving/Concrete work at WNHS – Recommend approval of the bids for paving/concrete work at WNHS as presented. 3. Approval of Bids for 2026 Facility Improvements: Roofing Project at Lowell Elementary School and Roofing/Tuckpointing projects at WWSHS – Recommend approval of the bids for roofing projects at Lowell and WWSHS as presented.
There was additional information/comments provided on the following:
● Items #2 and #3 were reviewed with the Facilities Committee at their last meeting. These items represent the remaining Sherman Dergis work for this upcoming summer, aligned with the Board’s approximately $7.2 million annual investment.
MOTION
Member Long moved, Member Rutledge seconded to approve the Facilities Approval Consent Agenda as presented. Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: AYE 7, NAY 0. The motion carried 7-0.
ACTION ITEMS
Resolution providing for the issue of not to exceed $75,000,000 General Obligation School Bonds for the purpose of constructing the middle school projects approved at the November 5, 2024 referendum, providing for the levy of a direct annual tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds, and authorizing the proposed sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof
In November 2024, the CUSD 200 Community overwhelmingly approved, in the General Election, the $151.5 million Middle School Capital Project Bond Proposal. The yes votes, totaling 68.01%, were canvassed and confirmed by the DuPage County Clerk on November 26, 2024. The Referendum approval allows CUSD 200 to move forward with additions and major renovations at Edison, Franklin, and Monroe Middle Schools.
Issuance/Phase 3 of the Middle School Capital Projects will commence in the summer of 2026 and continue in the summer of 2027. The work within Issuance 3 involves the complete interior renovations of Edison, Franklin, and Monroe Middle Schools. The District will require the second round of funding to pay for these upcoming obligations. It is expected that the second debt issuance, in an amount not to exceed $75.0M, will be sold via competitive bid in early January 2026, with final closing and disbursement occurring roughly 30 days after the competitive bid is complete. The District, with its strategic partners, continues to follow our construction paydown schedule and subsequent investment ladders that will allow for opportunities to maximize interest earnings during the multi-year construction period. Debt payments associated with the community-supported November 2024 Referendum will be accounted for in the annual Debt Service Tax Levy, starting with the 2025 Tax Levy.
Board President Hanlon announced the agenda item for consideration and Board Secretary Long read the Resolution:
RESOLUTION providing for the issue of not to exceed $75,000,000 General Obligation School Bonds for the purpose of constructing the middle school projects approved at the November 5, 2024 referendum, providing for the levy of a district annual tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest on said bonds, and authorizing the proposed sale of said bonds to the purchase thereof.
Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, Dr. Brian O’Keeffe, introduced Ms. Jennifer Currier, Vice President and Senior Quantitative Analyst of PMA Securities, LLC, who provided an Update of Referendum Plan of Finance for CUSD 200. This included information on the following:
● Recap of 2025 Sale and Market Update
● Bid Summary
○ Winning TIC of 3.55% by JP Morgan, compared to a TIC of 4.06% assured in the pre-referendum analysis
● Referendum Plan Update
● Debt Service of 2025 Bonds (2025 – 2039)
● Estimated Debt Service of 2026 Bonds (2025 – 2040)
● Estimated Debt Service After Issuance of 2026 Bonds
○ Includes Existing Debt Service, Proposed Series 2026 Referendum Debt Service, and Payment Offset (additional principal amount to be paid by funds on hand in the debt service fund and not an impact to the taxpayer).
● Summary of Key Statistics
○ Includes March 2025 Proceeds, March 2026 Proceeds, July 2027 Proceeds, Estimated Net Debt Service, Average Annual Debt Service LY 2026+, Estimated B&I Tax Rate Change in LY 2025, and the Estimated LY 2025 Tax Bill Change for Median Homeowner for both the Referendum Campaign (May 2024) and 15 Years + $2 Million Payment Offset
● Sample Timeline of Key Events for Bond Issuance
○ Board approves parameter resolution authorizing the sale (November 12), Bonds sold; delegates approve final results (January 6), Bonds close (February 10), Recap of bond sale to the Board (March 11), Document drafting including official statements, etc. (Start to End)
Additional information/comments were provided on the following:
● Noted the final steps in the process – to date the Board has approved two of the three bid issuance packages and has approved the sale of the first half of the referendum bonds. Tonight’s action will authorize the sale of the second half of the bonds, and it is expected that the Board will receive the final round of construction bids (for issuance three) at their December meeting.
● The original plan was to have two 15-year bond issues to generate the total referendum proceeds. The second series was initially expected to be issued a year later; however, the timeline and construction draw schedule were accelerated, so there is a single larger payment at the end of the structure, and the principal that would have been due in the second year is spread over the remaining term.
● Continuing to project a reduction in the annual payment and the bond portion of the homeowner’s tax bill. A reminder that the amounts are estimates and may change.
There were comments and/or questions on the following:
● Applying the funds to principal is in lieu of abatement. This is actually more financially beneficial than abatement, as it gives it back as payment against principal and will save interest over the 15-year life of the bond.
● Clarification that the first one done a few years ago was a true abatement (and was prior to the referendum passing), and this was done knowing there would likely be a little bit of accumulated fund balance left that the Board did not want to decide on until we got to this point to see what was left.
● Did the District consider taking the debt out an extra year? Yes, and there would be added debt service costs, and it would be more expensive in the long run.
● The reality of adjusting the timeline – something was going to change from the original chart – either the aggregate impact to the taxpayer or putting the estimated net debt service beyond what was communicated to the community. The chosen option will save the community the most money in the aggregate and is the most conservative.
● This timeline also results in one fewer payment at the end (one year earlier), giving the future board more flexibility sooner.
● The construction schedule has not shifted – substantial completion is expected by the first Friday in August.
● Factors that have changed since the assumptions – EAV was not known for 2024 during the referendum campaign.
It was recommended that the Board of Education approve the General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2026, Resolution as presented.
MOTION
Member Hjerpe moved, Member Ebbesen seconded to approve the General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2026 Resolution as presented. Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: AYE 7, NAY 0. The motion carried 7-0.
ORAL REPORTS
#1 – 2025 Proposed Property Tax Levy
The school code empowers the Board of Education to levy taxes to support the public school system. If the levy request exceeds 105% of the previous year’s aggregate extension, a public notice and hearing are needed before the official levy is adopted. The Board of Education is limited to an increase no greater than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the previous year under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL or “Tax Cap”), plus any anticipated new construction.
Annually, the Board of Education reviews a levy proposal prepared by the Administration. The 2025 proposed tax levy was previously discussed with the Board Finance Committee on November 3, 2025. The proposed tax levy, which provides for less than a 5% increase, will be presented. Based on the proposed tax levy being less than 5% over the prior extended levy, no Truth in Taxation Public Hearing will be required.
Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, Dr. Brian O’Keeffe, provided a PowerPoint presentation on the 2025 Tentative Tax Levy, which included information on the following:
● Levy Terms (Tax Cap-PTELL, CPI, EAV, Tax Rate – Limiting Rate)
● Tax Levy FAQ
○ What is a property tax levy?
○ Why is a property tax levy important for a school district?
○ How is a property tax levy calculated?
○ Is the property tax levy the CUSD 200 Board of Education approves a final figure?
○ If a school district uses estimates that are higher than the actual final figures for EAV and new growth, will they receive more money than they should?
● Consumer Price Index (CPI)
● CPI History and Projections (2020 – 2030)
● Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV)
● Tax Year 2024 EAV by Township (Milton, Winfield, and Winfield Townships)
● Tax Year 2024 EAV by Class (Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Railroad, Farms)
● EAV Analysis (2024 – 2030)
○ Total EAV Analysis (Dollars)
○ Total EAV % Change (EAV Increase & New Construction)
○ Existing EAV % Change
○ New EAV Growth (Dollars)
● EAV, CPI & Tax Rate
● Tax Rates
○ CUSD 200 Tax Rate Look back – 10 Years
○ Tax Rate Comparison – Unit Peers (Barrington, Elmhurst, Indian Prairie, Naperville 203, St. Charles)
● Fund Balances
○ Fund Balance History (2020 – 2024) By Fund and Percentage
○ Cash Fund Balance @ 6/30/2025
● Tax Levy Extension
● Major Levy Considerations
○ Budgeted Contracts & Inflationary Cost Increases, Levy Collection (May-June 2026) Included in 2025-26 Budget
○ Capture New Construction (Estimated $40.0M)
○ Continued Uncertainty in Mandated Categorical Reimbursements from the State
○ Funding of Projects Identified in Capital Plan
Open Session Minutes – November 12, 2025 Page 6
● How is the Extension Calculated?
● Projected 2025 Tax Rate Extension
● 2024 Tax Levy Extension Breakdown (Operations, Debt Service, Refund)
● 2025 Estimated Tax Levy Extension Breakdown (Operations, Debt Service, Refund)
● Year-Over-Year Levy Comparison
There was additional information on the following:
● DuPage County is a tax cap county.
● Tax levy is a statutory requirement if the District wants to seek funding from the taxpayers within the county. It is a request that goes to the county.
● Property taxes account for 78% of CUSD 200’s funding.
● The amount of the tax levy increase is determined by a formula established by the Illinois School Code.
● The county determines the actual extension and the tax rates.
● CPI is measured from December to December, and tax levy extensions are based on the twelve-month calendar year preceding the levy year.
● The correlation of what it costs to run a school district may not follow suit with the CPI rate used for tax levy extensions.
● Over the last thirty-plus years, CPI has averaged 2.53%.
● EAV is the tax assessed value of a property.
● Total EAV % Change refers to percentage changes based on township assessors’ final assessed values recorded at the clerk’s office. The expected increase for 2025 is nearly 8.5%. This is driven by property assessed values rising between 8-10% this year, according to information from every assessor’s office in DuPage County and based on what people are willing to pay for properties and their associated values. The difference between this and what is projected is due to new construction.
● The existing EAV does not change the tax levy as a whole, it just changes the actual tax limiting rate when the clerk’s office compiles the extension.
● A reminder that if we miss any new construction, we miss that dollar times CPI in perpetuity, so we always overestimate new construction. What happens in terms of the calculation and the extension from the clerk’s office is real.
● The symbiotic relationship between the tax rate and EAV: traditionally, if EAV is rising faster than CPI, the tax rate goes down, and vice versa.
● The overall tax rate has dropped over the last ten years (except for one year). This is a pretty consistent pattern for all of our comparable school districts. As a reminder, the tax rate is determined by the clerk’s office.
● There is a requirement to include fund balance information when discussing the preparation of the tax levy and presentation to the Board.
● The draft of the FY 25 audit is in final review and will be presented to the Board next month. Anticipate the fund balance being lower than the FY 24 number of 31%.
● The levy is always split between two fiscal years.
● The uncertainty at the state level about when payments are received by the District or whether reimbursements occur from a proration perspective in a matter we anticipate.
● How the extension is calculated – it’s a fairly simple math problem with many factors and pieces of information involved.
● As of now, the District is expecting a total levy of about $194.3 million.
● The overall tax increase is a total of 2.5% year-over-year for the 2025 levy.
There were comments and/or questions on the following:
● Refunds and protests – any protest related to a request for a reduction in taxes from someone who has filed a petition after the tax bills have been sent, and a refund has been granted.
● Appeal of the value of the property assessed by the assessor.
● Structurally, the tax levy process is the same as in the past.
#2 – Development of Vision 2030 Strategic Plan
District 200 has utilized strategic planning as a tool to guide the work of the District and School Board. Our current strategic planning effort, Vision 2026, started with the development of our Portrait of a Graduate. That work involved two rounds of community input, and the work of a design team that developed the Portrait based on the input and community engagement sessions. The Portrait was presented to the Board of Education in January of 2022, and launched the development of our Vision 2026 Plan that has guided our work for the last four years. As discussed at the October COW Meeting, the District has begun work on a new Vision 2030 Strategic Plan. Our goal would be to work on this plan through the Spring of 2026, with a goal of bringing a draft of the Vision 2030 Plan to the Board of Education by May. The work will be guided by a Core Planning Team and informed by feedback from both internal and external stakeholder groups. We anticipate a January discussion with the Board that will explore specific items from our current Strategic Plan, Strategic Dashboard, and Vision/Mission/Portrait of a Graduate that the Board would like to keep/adjust, drop, or add.
In anticipation of the January discussion with the Board of Education on the Vision 2030 Strategic Plan, District Administration held an initial discussion with the Board of Education about our current Vision 2026 Plan. Specifically, exploring the question, “What are you most proud of with our current strategic plan?” The Board of Education was asked for feedback on why strategic planning is important to a school district from their perspective. This initial conversation will help to frame the work that our Core Team does in preparation for the January discussion.
There was additional information/discussion on the following:
● The goal for tonight is to ensure the Board is solidly anchored in the six major components of the strategic plan, including: the visioning element, strategy elements, indicators/metrics, the engagement process, keeping the strategic plan on a single page, and the deployment strategy/process.
● Every plan needs to be flexible, as something will change over the next four years.
● The Board was asked from the six elements what they liked and to provide any immediate feedback to guide the work.
There were comments and/or questions on the following:
● Like the condensed version of the strategic plan, and both the academic and operational excellence strategies.
● Like the approach and how it all fits together.
● Provides flexibility from an academic standpoint.
● Mission and Vision – might want to consider adding a value statement to build district culture; noted honor and integrity.
● Believe that culture is included in each of the bullet points, but review and examine whether it should be removed or kept within them.
● Like the agility, dashboard, and yearly initiatives.
● Continue to focus on post-secondary education.
● Fiscal health and the challenges ahead of us in the next five years.
● Portrait of a Graduate (POG).
○ Given how much has shifted in the workplace, is it an accurate representation of what we want?
○ POG needs a refresh.
○ Teaching children how to learn should be reflected in the POG.
○ How to prepare students to be good citizens and functional human beings.
○ Who do we want students to be in our community, and how do we want them to give back?
● The strategic plan has been an anchor for the District – be cautious of changing too much. This plan has worked so well for us to guide the work, priorities and investments – the need to protect that.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
#1 – Discussion of IASB Resolutions and Direction for Delegate Voting
Each year the Illinois Association of School Boards (IASB) holds an annual conference. At the annual conference, resolutions submitted for consideration are reviewed. Resolutions that are adopted then become items the IASB works to change or implement. The Delegate Assembly takes place at the Illinois Association of School Boards (IASB) Joint Annual Conference in November. Board Member Erik Hjerpe will represent the Board as the Delegate for the November meeting.
Board Members received the Resolutions Committee Report at the October meeting and identified those for consideration that needed additional information prior to discussion. The Board will discuss those that will be voted on at the 2025 Delegate Assembly meeting on November 22, 2025.
There was discussion on the following:
● This was the Board’s final opportunity to guide Delegate Hjerpe to vote in a different direction than previously discussed.
● Delegate Hjerpe noted that there was one resolution before the Delegate Assembly, and it is non-controversial. There are a lot of constitutional changes for IASB.
● The Board supported Delegate Hjepe voting according to the guidance from IASB.
● The Board noted that it is the lightest agenda for the Delegate Assembly in recent years.
BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Board Facilities Committee
The Board Facilities Committee met on October 6, 2025. The meeting notes were attached. The committee also met on November 10, 2025. The December board packet will include the meeting notes from this date. There was additional information on the following:
● Member Long commented on the discussion at the November 10th committee meeting.
● The committee discussed the High School athletics master facility plan. The District has a bid from Perkins+Will and is in the process of obtaining a bid from Legat Architects. Part of this process will be to identify underutilized spaces.
● Middle School construction – bid issuance #3: There are nine bid packages, and the bids will be opened on December 2nd.
● Discussed the bond sale expected to occur in early January 2026.
● Discussed an Elementary Strategic Facility Planning Tool with the goal of creating a 10-year plan. The proposal is to conduct an assessment and purchase the tool to monitor priority needs. We want to ensure we have a clear 10-year outlook from a facility perspective and maintain a comprehensive inventory of all key equipment.
● Athletic fields – injury occurrences and artificial vs. other turf. A request for this to be part of the process/review.
Board Finance Committee
The Board Finance Committee met on November 3, 2025. The meeting notes were attached to the agenda item. There was additional information on the following:
● Member Hjerpe noted that the discussion on the debt issuance and the levy was reviewed earlier tonight.
● The other topic was a discussion on the cash flow and fund balance policy. The questions were whether we want to adjust the fund balance floor and ceiling, and whether to bolster fund balances to ensure we are covered from a cash flow perspective in the future.
● The upcoming five-year planning process.
BoardHR/Policy Committee
The Board HR/Policy Committee met on October 16, 2025. The meeting notes were attached to the agenda item. There was additional information on the following:
● Member Kulovits commented on the discussion items: flag placement in the classroom and the current practice of a district-issued flag in each classroom. Identified what questions the committee had regarding classrooms that do not have a clear “front” to them. There is one policy in the upcoming PRESS issue that includes education and the proper use and display of the flag, so this will be reviewed.
● PRESS Issue 120 was just released and will be discussed over the next couple of committee meetings.
● Policy 8:30 (Visitors to and Conduct on School Property) was also reviewed. The committee discussed updating this policy to modernize it and include virtual communication and how people interact electronically through email with staff and others.
● The committee is meeting tomorrow, November 13, to continue discussions.
REPORTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS
Board members noted visits to/participating in the following:
● Lowell Elementary School and Wheaton North HS visits.
● Several Board members attended the DuPage Division Meeting, noting the topic “The Art of Schoolboarding.”
WRITTEN REPORTS
Monthly Financial Reports
FOIA Report
Board Communication Log
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Report
TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION
2025 Tax Levy Approval
Fiscal Year 2025 Audit
2027-28 School Calendar
School calendar – How to communicate and raise awareness about it, and how people can provide feedback. You can do anything but not everything with the calendar. There was a request to gather feedback on this year’s calendar.
NEXT REGULAR MEETING
December 10, 2025, 7:00 PM, Bower Elementary School
ANNOUNCEMENTS
December 6, 2025 – Coffee with the Board, 9:00 AM, School Service Center
CLOSED SESSION
The Appointment, Employment, Compensation, Discipline, Performance, or Dismissal of Specific Employees, Specific Individuals who Serve as Independent Contractors in a Park, Recreational, or Educational Setting, or Specific Volunteers of the Public Body or Legal Counsel for the Public Body, including Hearing Testimony on a Complaint Lodged Against an Employee, a Specific Individual who Serves as an Independent Contractor in a Park, Recreational, or Educational Setting, or a Volunteer of the Public Body or Against Legal Counsel for the Public Body to Determine its Validity 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (1)
MOTION
Member Rutledge moved, Member Kulovits seconded to adjourn the meeting to closed session pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (1). Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was AYE 7, NAY 0. The motion carried 7-0. No action was expected following the closed session.
The meeting adjourned to Closed Session at 8:59 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION
There being no further business to come before the Board in Open Session, Member Hjerpe moved, Member Kulovits seconded to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice call being taken, all were in favor. The motion carried 7-0.
The meeting adjourned at 9:57 PM.
https://files-backend.assets.thrillshare.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3696/Cusd200/5a8c4fa3-7443-49c0-8a66-637b78ead582/Minutes-11.12.25.docx.pdf?disposition=inline
